| In
the early morning hours of January 15, 2006, a space capsule filled
with comet dust will fall from the sky and touch down in the Utah
desert. And Donald Brownlee will heave a huge sigh of relief.
Brownlee, UW professor
of astronomy, is
principal investigator of Stardust
Mission, a NASA-funded project that launched a spacecraft in
1999 to capture dust samples from a comet known as Wild 2. The comet
was formed near Pluto at the very edge of the solar system and has
only recently entered the inner solar system where it could be approached
for sampling.
| |
 |
| |
An
artist’s rendering of the Stardust spacecraft. All
images courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech. |
Why go through so much
effort to collect comet dust? “Comets like Wild 2 are leftovers
from the creation of the solar system,” explains Brownlee,
“and are believed to be the solar system’s most unchanged,
pristine bodies. This means that their materials, from which all
of the planets formed, are the oldest and most basic available for
study.”
Like balls in a pinball
game, comets tend to get batted around, either hitting planets or
being tossed between them. Many are eventually destroyed or catapulted
out of the solar system. But Wild 2’s relatively short exposure
time in the inner solar system has left it fairly intact. And, importantly,
it is within reach.
“We chose this comet because we knew we could get to it with
our propulsion capability and get back,” says Brownlee. “But
designing and building the spacecraft was a huge challenge.”
The Stardust spacecraft
weighs only about 770 pounds and is the size of a desk, except for
its solar panels, which extend several feet in the front and back.
(The use of solar power was one of the guidelines of the mission.)
“The spacecraft needed to operate in harsh environments —extreme
heat, extreme cold—using only solar power, farther from the
sun than any spacecraft has ever been,” says Brownlee. “It’s
really a formidable challenge to foresee all problems that might
arise, and it’s very difficult to fix things in space. The
simplest things can do you in. That’s why missions are so
expensive. The quality control and attention to detail are incredible.”
Beyond the equipment
itself, there was the challenge of collecting samples from a comet
passing the spacecraft at a speed of 22,000 kilometers per hour.
The team had to design an orbit for the spacecraft that brought
it as close to the comet as possible without being destroyed—the
optimal distance being a source of much debate —while traveling
at the same speed as the comet. And, of course, the orbit had to
allow for the capsule’s safe return to Earth. To accomplish
this, the spacecraft made three loops around the sun, its trajectory
intersecting with the comet on the second loop.
That daring encounter
took place on January 2, 2004. Brownlee, who watched from the control
room of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, recalls it being
“a real white knuckle experience.”
| |
 |
| |
Don
Brownlee (standing, far left) watches—and applauds—in
the control room during Stardust’s successful encounter
with Comet Wild 2 in January 2004. |
“We were basically
trying to accomplish a miracle, trying to make the orbital paths
of the two bodies as similar as possible,” says Brownlee.
“There are a lot of things we had some level of control over,
but we had no control over the comet. We had to get close enough
to collect a significant number of small particles, but we didn’t
want the spacecraft to be hit by any rocks larger than one centimeter.”
At its closest point, the spacecraft was 243 kilometers from the
comet.
The fly-by was a huge
success. The spacecraft extended its collector, resembling an oversized
tennis racket, to capture thousands of comet particles. The particles
became embedded in aerogel, a highly porous material used in the
collector. A spacecraft camera also took photos during the encounter,
which Brownlee describes as “phenomenal.”
There have been other
moments of drama during the seven-year mission. At one point, a
solar flare blinded the cameras used for controlling the spacecraft’s
navigation, sending Stardust into a spin with the solar panels pointing
at the sun. There was no signal from the spacecraft for at least
a day, causing great concern. But the signal eventually returned
and Stardust suffered no permanent damage. A similar event occurred
more recently.
“Disaster is always
right around the corner,” says Brownlee. “With a spacecraft,
things can go completely wrong at the snap of a finger.”
 |
|
|
The Stardust Mission's launch in 1999. |
|
Brownlee can breathe
easier when the mission completes its final hurdle— the capsule’s
safe return to Earth—in January. Although far less daunting
than the fly-by in space, the return has required considerable planning.
“The capsule will
come in from the west at a low angle, aimed at a dry lake area just
west of Salt Lake City,” says Brownlee. “We will release
the capsule four hours before. It will start spinning and release
two parachutes along the way.” Folks in northern Nevada will
be able to see the capsule’s return as “a fireball across
the sky” if they happen to be awake at 3 a.m., when the capsule
reenters the Earth’s atmosphere.
That will be a banner
moment for scientists around the world who have
been eager to analyze the comet dust from Wild 2. While the samples
from this comet are certainly not the first extraterrestial materials
to be collected and studied, they are valuable because their source
is known.
“Most other materials
are orphans—we don’t know where they came from,”
explains Brownlee. “One of our goals for these samples is
to provide context for our existing samples.”
But first, Brownlee
looks forward to witnessing the completion of a mission that began
seven years ago.
“The capsule’s
return is the easiest thing we’ve done, but there are still
risks,” he says. “I definitely plan to celebrate when
this is over.”
[Autumn 2005 - Table of Contents]
|